
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare is becoming more prevalent in medical practice and diagnostics; however, this rapid advancement raises critical ethical questions surrounding the governance of AI. Issues such as algorithmic bias, patient privacy, and transparency of machine learning models are at the forefront of this discussion.
Recent advancements have highlighted the potential for AI to improve patient outcomes through enhanced diagnostics and personalized treatment plans. However, these benefits must be balanced against risks such as data security breaches and the perpetuation of existing biases in healthcare systems. With human-AI relationship continually developing, any risks, such as clinicians failing to detect errors in LLM-generated notes—potentially leading to patient harm—arise from human factors rather than the technology itself. This highlights the need for broader ethical considerations beyond the AI tool to facilitate its integration into clinical practice.
With the inevitable integration of AI into healthcare, the continued dialogue on AI ethics is necessary to shape guidelines that safeguard patient safety and uphold the principles of equity and justice in healthcare.
BMC Medical Ethics is calling for submissions to our Collection, Ethical AI in healthcare. Key topics of interest for submission include, but are not limited to:
- Addressing clinical bias in healthcare algorithms
- Patient privacy and data security in AI applications
- Ethical implications of healthcare automation related to real-time use of AI applications
- Transparency in machine learning for clinical settings
- Ethical issues arising from the sociotechnical context of AI use
- Ethics around the environmental implications of AI use, with respect to human health
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities.
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Image credit: © yuriygolub / stock.adobe.com